295,000
Industrial robots installed in China in 2024
Robotics Supplier Landscape
China has developed a broad robotics ecosystem spanning industrial robots, collaborative arms, mobile robots, service robots, humanoids, quadrupeds, medical systems and critical components.
This guide explains how Chinese robotics companies differ, which capabilities they control, and what buyers should verify before treating a company as a qualified manufacturing supplier.
China’s robotics market is not one uniform supplier category. It contains complete robot OEMs, specialist manufacturers, system integrators, ODM and contract manufacturers, component suppliers and software-led robotics companies.
For sourcing purposes, the main question is not simply which companies sell robots. It is which parts of the mechanical architecture, control stack, software, manufacturing process and supply chain each company actually owns.
The figures below refer specifically to industrial robots and the 2024 reporting year. They do not cover humanoid, medical, consumer or service robots.
295,000
Industrial robots installed in China in 2024
54%
Share of global industrial robot installations in 2024
57%
Share of installations by domestic Chinese manufacturers
2M+
Operational industrial-robot stock in China (estimated)
Source: International Federation of Robotics, World Robotics 2025. The IFR reports that China installed 295,000 industrial robots in 2024, representing 54% of global deployments; domestic manufacturers reached a 57% share of the Chinese market, and the operational stock exceeded two million. Preliminary 2025 China installation figures had not yet been published as of June 2026.
A company selling robots is not necessarily a robotics manufacturer. Supplier qualification requires understanding what the company designs, manufactures, integrates, licenses and outsources. Manufacturer classification matters because catalogue breadth, marketing language and trading access often conceal different levels of technology ownership and production control.
| Company model | What it normally controls | Typical output | Main sourcing risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete robot OEM | Mechanical platform, controller, firmware, software and assembly | Complete robot systems | Proprietary ecosystem and switching costs |
| Specialist robot OEM | A particular robot type or application | Cobots, AMRs, welding robots, inspection robots | Narrow application range |
| System integrator | Application engineering, tooling and cell integration | Turnkey automation cells | Does not necessarily own the robot technology |
| ODM / private-label manufacturer | Design and production for another brand | Customized or rebranded robot products | IP, exclusivity and platform ownership |
| Contract manufacturer | Assembly and production execution | Buyer-designed robotic products | Limited architecture or software responsibility |
| Component manufacturer | Motors, reducers, controllers, sensors or actuators | Components and subsystems | Integration remains the buyer’s responsibility |
| Distributor or trading company | Sales, logistics and commercial access | Third-party robot systems | Limited technical and production control |
| Software-led robotics company | AI, control, perception or fleet software | Software stack or integrated solution | Dependence on external hardware and cloud systems |
Required conclusion: A company should not be classified solely by what appears in its catalogue. Determine what it designs, manufactures, assembles, licenses, integrates and outsources.
Chinese robotics companies span several product segments with different engineering stacks, qualification criteria and commercial models. The summaries below introduce each segment; dedicated supplier pages cover industrial, collaborative and service robots in more depth.
Six-axis, SCARA, Cartesian, welding and palletizing platforms.
View Companies →Lightweight arms, force sensing and application ecosystems.
View Companies →AMRs, AGVs, delivery, cleaning and hospitality robots.
View Companies →Bipedal, wheeled and embodied platforms at varying maturity.
View Companies →Chinese industrial robot companies supply articulated six-axis robots, SCARA robots, Cartesian and delta systems, and application-focused platforms for welding, palletizing and machine tending. Buyers must separate robot bodies from completed automation cells, and OEMs from system integrators that wrap third-party arms with tooling and software.
Controller, servo and reducer ownership often determines long-term switching cost and spare-parts risk. Official product material confirms that companies such as ESTUN, SIASUN, EFORT and ROKAE currently operate across industrial robots, automation systems or related robotics categories. Company claims must still be distinguished from independent evidence.
See the dedicated guide to industrial robot suppliers.
Chinese collaborative robot companies typically emphasize lightweight arms, payload and reach combinations suited to assembly or machine tending, force and torque sensing, and simplified programming. Secondary-development interfaces, gripper ecosystems and safety-rated functions are central evaluation points.
A collaborative robot is not automatically a safe completed application; cell design, safeguarding and validated use cases remain the buyer’s responsibility. Current official product portfolios show active Chinese cobot ecosystems around companies such as DOBOT, JAKA, AUBO and Elite Robots.
See the dedicated guide to collaborative robot suppliers.
Mobile and service robot companies in China cover AMRs and AGVs, warehouse and intralogistics systems, commercial delivery, cleaning and hospitality robots, and hospital logistics. Fleet-management software, building integration, mapping, cloud connectivity and data dependency often matter as much as the mechanical platform.
Field-service requirements—local response, spare parts, remote diagnosis and software updates—should be assessed before deployment. Current official portfolios from Pudu, Keenon, Geek+ and Quicktron illustrate the breadth of commercial service and mobile-robot systems, from delivery and cleaning robots to warehouse automation and AMR fleets.
See the dedicated guide to service robot suppliers.
Humanoids form a distinct supplier ecosystem with their own standards trajectory and commercialization pathways. Official reporting said China had more than 140 domestic humanoid manufacturers and over 330 models in 2025. China also introduced its first national humanoid-robot standard system in 2026, organized around six areas: foundational standards, intelligent computing, limbs and components, complete machines and systems, applications, and safety and ethics.
Humanoid-related companies include full-size bipedal platform companies, wheeled humanoid platforms, research and developer platforms, industrial embodied-robot companies, humanoid component manufacturers, embodied-AI and training-data companies, and robot-data collection and simulation providers. Each model implies different ownership of actuators, control software, training data and manufacturing capacity.
Buyers should place every claim on a maturity ladder and refuse to treat public performance, trade-show demonstration, preorder, factory pilot, units produced, units delivered and productive operating hours as interchangeable evidence.
A humanoid stack typically includes joint actuators, reducers, motors and drives, dexterous hands, force and tactile sensing, perception, onboard compute, batteries, locomotion control, manipulation policies, teleoperation, training data, and fleet and update infrastructure. Mapping which layers are owned, licensed or purchased is essential before treating a company as a manufacturing candidate.
Representative candidates currently publishing active humanoid or legged-robot portfolios through official channels include Unitree Robotics, UBTECH Robotics, AgiBot and Fourier Intelligence. Other organizations often referenced in the segment include EngineAI, Leju Robot, LimX Dynamics, Galbot, Beijing Humanoid Robot Innovation Center and Kepler Robotics. Inclusion is not endorsement or supplier qualification.
Quadruped and inspection robots are used in electric power inspection, industrial inspection, emergency response, research, security and hazardous environments. Evaluation should cover sensor and payload integration, teleoperation versus autonomy, environmental ratings and field-support logistics.
Medical and surgical robotics covers laparoscopic systems, orthopedic robots, rehabilitation systems, and intervention and navigation platforms. Assessment must address medical-device regulation, clinical evidence, service and training, and responsibility for software and instruments. MicroPort MedBot is one current example of a Chinese company operating across multiple surgical-robot categories, but medical suppliers must be assessed through product-specific regulatory approvals rather than general company reputation.
Component and subsystem companies supply servo motors, drives, harmonic and planetary reducers, encoders, controllers, machine vision, force sensors, LiDAR, actuators, batteries, grippers and end effectors. Buyers building or customizing robot platforms often need a component map alongside OEM selection. Related component guidance will be published under the robotics components cluster as those pages go live.
The companies below are representative examples of active organizations in different robotics segments. Inclusion does not constitute endorsement, ranking, supplier qualification or confirmation of suitability for a specific project.
| Company | Segment | Company model | Evidence status | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESTUN | Industrial | Complete / specialist OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| SIASUN | Industrial / automation | OEM and systems | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| EFORT | Industrial | Robot OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| ROKAE | Industrial / cobot | Robot OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| DOBOT | Collaborative | Specialist robot OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| JAKA Robotics | Collaborative | Specialist robot OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| AUBO Robotics | Collaborative | Specialist robot OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| Elite Robots | Collaborative | Specialist robot OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| Pudu Robotics | Service | Specialist robot OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| Keenon Robotics | Service | Specialist robot OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| Geek+ | Mobile / warehouse | Specialist OEM / systems | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| Quicktron | Mobile / warehouse | Specialist OEM / systems | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| Unitree Robotics | Humanoid / legged | Specialist robot OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| UBTECH Robotics | Humanoid / service | Specialist robot OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| AgiBot | Humanoid / embodied | Platform company | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| Fourier Intelligence | Humanoid / rehab | Specialist OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
| MicroPort MedBot | Medical / surgical | Specialist OEM | Company-reported | July 2026 |
Evidence labels used on this page: Verified by primary document; Company-reported; Supported by independent source; Not independently confirmed; Not disclosed. Product families and manufacturing claims should be reconfirmed on official company sites before RFQ.
Robotics activity clusters around several Chinese regions. Geographic clustering can improve access to engineering talent, components and specialist suppliers. It is not evidence that an individual company has the required manufacturing capability.
Shanghai officially identifies dedicated robotics industrial zones covering automation, key components, precision instruments, medical robots and service robots. Beijing has also continued developing humanoid and robotics industrial clusters.
| Region | Cities to investigate | Typical ecosystem relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Yangtze River Delta | Shanghai, Suzhou, Nanjing, Hangzhou, Changzhou | Industrial automation, motion control, precision manufacturing, humanoids |
| Greater Bay Area | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou, Foshan | Electronics, service robots, cobots, sensors, rapid product development |
| Beijing–Tianjin | Beijing, Tianjin | AI, embodied intelligence, research institutions and advanced control |
| Northeast China | Shenyang | Industrial robots, heavy industry and automation |
| Central China | Wuhan, Hefei, Changsha | Automotive automation, research and emerging robotics companies |
Supplier selection should begin with an explicit requirement model. The framework below organizes evaluation around architecture, ownership, manufacturing evidence, dependency, software, quality, compliance and lifecycle support.
Require test conditions for every performance claim.
Do not assume “self-developed” means every subsystem is internally produced.
Distinguish prototype workshop, pilot line, low-volume assembly, stable serial production and high-volume production.
For each part ask who manufactures it, whether it is single-sourced or imported, what substitutes exist, and how changes are notified.
For service robots and humanoids, this may be as important as mechanical capability.
Relevant international robotics standards now include ISO 10218-1:2025 and ISO 10218-2:2025 for industrial robots and robot applications. ISO/TS 15066:2016 remains published for collaborative robots, while a replacement project is under development. Compliance with one standard does not automatically prove the complete system is safe or legally marketable.
Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 will generally apply from 20 January 2027, so projects intended for the EU must consider both the market-entry date and whether the supplier’s documentation is prepared for the new machinery framework. Do not rely on a universal list of “certifications every robot needs.”
Use the following fields for side-by-side manufacturer comparison. Do not publish numeric scores until a documented scoring methodology exists.
| Field | What to record |
|---|---|
| Company | Official English name and verified Chinese legal name |
| Company model | OEM, integrator, ODM, CM, component supplier or software-led |
| Robot category / target application | Industrial, cobot, mobile, service, humanoid, medical, specialist |
| Product status | Concept, prototype, evaluation product, pilot, shipped, serial production |
| Payload and reach | With stated test conditions |
| Core technology owned / outsourced | Mechanics, controller, software, actuators, perception |
| Controller ownership / software and API access | Owned, licensed, purchased; SDK rights |
| Customization level | Standard, configurable, custom platform |
| Production location and evidence | Factory, line, filings, shipment evidence |
| Quality system / compliance evidence | Product-specific certificates or declarations |
| Export markets / service coverage | Offices, partners, response model |
| MOQ / sample / lead time / warranty / spare parts | Commercial commitments |
| Restricted-party result | Exact list, authority, date, relevance |
| Primary risks / evidence status / last verified | With sources |
Checks may include restricted-party and government procurement lists, export-control classifications, end-use restrictions, ownership and affiliate screening, cybersecurity requirements, data-hosting requirements, defence and critical-infrastructure restrictions, import controls and customer-specific compliance policies.
The US Department of Defense’s June 2026 Section 1260H document includes Hangzhou Yushu Technology Co., Ltd., identified as Unitree, among other technology entities. This page describes the exact list and issuing authority rather than inaccurately relabelling it as a universal sanctions or import-ban list.
Editorial rule: Never state that a company is “sanctioned,” “banned” or legally unavailable solely because it appears on one government list. State the exact legal instrument or list, issuing authority, publication date, entity name and practical relevance to the specific transaction. Recommend professional trade-compliance review for transaction-specific conclusions.
| Risk | What the buyer must verify |
|---|---|
| Integrator represented as OEM | Ownership of design, controller, software, factory and production records |
| Demonstration mistaken for production readiness | Repeated test evidence, deployed units and production validation |
| Broad catalogue with limited internal capability | Actual engineering teams and product ownership |
| Undisclosed critical-component dependency | BOM, approved supplier list and substitution plan |
| Performance claims without test conditions | Payload, speed, temperature, reach and duty-cycle assumptions |
| Software ownership ambiguity | Licences, source access, update rights and third-party dependencies |
| Silent component substitution | Engineering-change and customer-notification process |
| Incomplete safety claims | Product certificates versus completed-application assessment |
| Weak overseas support | Response times, spare parts, local service and remote diagnostics |
| Product discontinuation | Lifecycle commitment and backward compatibility |
| Cloud or data dependency | Hosting, connectivity, data access and offline operation |
| IP exposure | Drawings, software, tooling, telemetry and access permissions |
| Restricted-party exposure | Buyer-specific legal and procurement screening |
Catalogue claims without owned technology or production evidence.
Single-sourced or imported reducers, sensors and compute.
Missing end-of-line, burn-in or field reliability data.
Unclear ownership of drawings, firmware and tooling.
Certificates that do not match destination-market use.
No spare-parts, local service or update pathway.
Use the Robotics Manufacturer RFQ Checklist above as an on-page preparation list before outreach. It is a static checklist, not a software platform.
Yana begins by defining the engineering, manufacturing, quality, commercial and supply-chain capabilities required by the project. Manufacturers are then evaluated against the same evidence model rather than compared only through catalogue features, company presentations or quoted price.
Lock robot category, application, volume, destination market and evidence standards.
Map candidate company models and segment-fit before shortlisting names.
Separate company-reported claims from primary-document evidence.
Request architecture, BOM dependencies, capacity, compliance and commercial terms.
Review production location, process control, testing and quality systems.
Validate performance under stated test conditions and application constraints.
Document residual risks, restricted-party relevance and lifecycle commitments.
There is no single ranking of “main” Chinese robotics companies that is useful for sourcing. Active organizations appear across industrial (for example ESTUN, SIASUN, EFORT, ROKAE), collaborative (DOBOT, JAKA, AUBO, Elite Robots), service and mobile (Pudu, Keenon, Geek+, Quicktron), humanoid and legged (Unitree, UBTECH, AgiBot, Fourier) and medical (MicroPort MedBot) segments. Selection should follow application fit and evidence of manufacturing control, not brand familiarity. See the representative company landscape.
China’s robotics ecosystem includes industrial robots, collaborative arms, AMRs and AGVs, commercial service robots, humanoids, quadrupeds, medical and surgical systems, and critical components such as reducers, servos and controllers. Segment-specific evaluation criteria differ. Start with the segment summaries and sibling supplier pages.
Companies currently publishing active humanoid or legged-robot portfolios through official channels include Unitree Robotics, UBTECH Robotics, AgiBot and Fourier Intelligence. Other organizations appear in research, component or platform roles. Public demonstration is not commercial deployment. Use the humanoid maturity model when reviewing claims.
Industrial robot activity includes articulated, SCARA, Cartesian, welding and palletizing platforms. Official materials place ESTUN, SIASUN, EFORT and ROKAE among companies operating in industrial robots or related automation. Confirm whether you need a robot body, a completed cell or an integrator. See industrial robot suppliers.
Current official portfolios show active Chinese cobot ecosystems around DOBOT, JAKA, AUBO and Elite Robots. Evaluate payload, reach, force sensing, programming interfaces, safety functions and the completed application separately from the arm. See collaborative robot suppliers.
A robotics company may sell, integrate, brand or software-enable robots without owning the mechanical platform, controller, firmware or factory. A robot manufacturer designs and/or produces robot systems or major subsystems under a defined model (OEM, ODM, CM or component maker). Classification should follow control of design, production and software, not catalogue language. See What Counts as a Robotics Manufacturer?.
Request production addresses, process ownership, capacity and output evidence; review filings or independent records where available; and distinguish headquarters, R&D sites and assembly locations. Factory tours, production records, calibration assets and end-of-line test data are stronger than marketing photos. Treat company-reported factory claims as unverified until corroborated.
An OEM owns the robot platform and typically the controller and firmware. A system integrator delivers turnkey cells, tooling and application software and may purchase the arm from another vendor. Ask who owns the mechanical design, controller IP, safety documentation and spare-parts pathway. See the company-model table.
Reliability is product-specific and depends on design ownership, component quality, manufacturing control, validation rigor and field-support model. No national origin guarantees or disproves reliability. Require test conditions, life-cycle evidence, warranty-return data and spare-parts commitments for the exact product under consideration.
Commonly outsourced or purchased items include reducers, servo motors, drives, encoders, cameras, LiDAR, force sensors, batteries, safety devices and industrial computers. Even OEMs that describe platforms as self-developed may buy critical subsystems. Build a dependency map before qualification. See evaluation step 4.
Include robot type, application, payload, reach, performance targets with test conditions, environment, safety and protocol needs, software integration, volume, prototype quantity, destination market, compliance expectations, commercial terms, IP and software ownership, and service requirements. Use the RFQ checklist.
Requirements depend on destination market, intended use and whether you are importing a product or a completed system. Machinery safety, electrical safety, EMC, radio, functional safety, cybersecurity and medical-device rules may apply. For the EU, Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 generally applies from 20 January 2027. Do not rely on a universal certificate list.
Screen against the exact lists relevant to the buyer jurisdiction, end use and procurement policy. Record the instrument name, issuing authority, publication date, entity name and transaction relevance. Appearance on one government list is not automatically a universal ban. Obtain professional trade-compliance review for transaction-specific conclusions. See regulatory screening.
Compare companies against a fixed evidence model: company model, technology ownership, manufacturing evidence, component dependency, software rights, quality system, compliance evidence, service coverage and residual risks. Avoid rankings based on marketing claims or undated listicles. Use the comparison matrix.
Share the robot category, application, technical requirements, production stage, target volume and destination market. Yana can help structure the manufacturer search, qualification and risk-review process.
No account creation is required. Provide structured information so the requirement can be scoped accurately.